My views on terrorism

-

A misunderstanding has been reported from certain quarters about my views on terrorism. I "seem" to justify Islamic terrorism in India, but also condemn LTTE terrorism in Sri Lanka. This post is for those who may be interested in understanding my views better.

When I acknowledge the possible causes of terrorist activity, it does not mean that I justify it. I condemn violence. I do not approve of it no matter what the causes.

To avoid spurring terrorism it is necessary to have a clear understanding of why terrorists resort to terrorism. Only then can we avoid making mistakes whilst tackling it.

I disapprove of the majority community in a nation demanding or actively working towards establishing superiority because this makes minority groups insecure and possibly react in a rash manner. Meanwhile, I also disapprove of terrorists resorting to violence to get their way. I believe that violence can never lead to anything constructive.

So, whose side am I on. you ask? Well, I am not taking sides.

If I am talking to the terrorist, I say to him, "I think your methods are flawed"

If I am talking to the majority community in a nation, I say to them, "I think you must refrain from subjugating minority communities. it could cause them to flare up"

Do you find me confusing?

Comments

scorpiogenius said…
Not only you or your explanation, but I find the whole logic behind these terrorism and ploys of counter-terrorism confusing. ;)
31 August 2009 at 18:07
Pooja Nair said…
Scorpiogenius,

Regarding your confusion about me, let me put it plainly in a single line:

I am against violence.

Regarding your confusion about the rest of the things you have mentioned, well you will have to arrive at your own conclusions like others have...

Until then, happy researching, thinking etc! :)
1 September 2009 at 10:12
Anonymous said…
Hey Pooja,
I can totally understand your point of view. Have often found myself wondering and debating the origin and need of this phenomenon called terrorism. Your post reminds me of a character called Taslima Jehangir from the movie 'Crossing Over'. She expresses her opinion about why terrosists do what they do and is mistaken for supporting them. Its a nice movie. Have you watched it?
8 September 2009 at 06:12
Pooja Nair said…
Hi lmtamommy!

So, glad that someone in the blogworld shares my point of view! phew! :)

I have not seen this movie. Will see it. Sounds interesting. Thanks!
8 September 2009 at 16:53
Abhilash said…
Cool! Appreciate the explanation!
-from 'certain quarters'
18 September 2009 at 23:59
Pooja Nair said…
Abhilash...hehehe... thanks friend!
22 September 2009 at 11:40
kedar said…
nope, i thinks it's absolutely fair. i just wish the people in power saw it that way too.
12 November 2009 at 12:11
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Narendra Modi - protector of Hindutva?

-
Image
This is not an anti-Hindu post. This is not a pro-Muslim post. This is not a BJP vs Congress post. This is about Narendra Modi and Hindutva Please keep that in mind when leaving comments. Now that I have cleared that, I want to ask all you people who are proud to be Hindu’s, are you also proud of the so called ‘protectors’ of Hinduism via 'hindutva'? The Tehelka Exposure has left us in no doubt of the Gujrat Goverment's hand in orchestrating the cold blooded massacre in 2002. There is no room for debate on that front anymore. Members of the VHP, Bajrand Dal and Shiv sena confess with pride their hand in the cold murder of Muslim men, women and children. They raped them, cut their limbs and burnt them. Just an instance: Babu Bajrangi, then VHP leader, current Shiv Sena Leader, brags that he ripped open the stomach of a pregnant woman. I have grown up with an adequate exposure to the Ramayana, the Mahabharata and the Geeta. The amount any regular Hindu is exposed to in this c...
Read more

The joke in stereotypes

-
I often come across people who form opinions about people based on stereotypes. I have always campaigned against it. However, many continue to adamantly stick to their opinions. Women can not be interested in sports Blonds are dumb Sardar ji’s are fools Muslims have a natural inclination to become terrorists People from Bihar lack culture Gujrati’s are misers There are many more that one can think of. While all these stereotypes are based on certain facts and perhaps figures. It still doesn’t make sense to judge an individual based on the colour of his/her hair or the country of his/her origin. One must judge a person for what he/she is. I know most of the readers of this post are in agreement with me but I’m truly disheartened by the number of people who allow themselves to get swayed by such stereotypes. Here’s the joke: As part of my job, I had to attend a few focus group discussions of late. In every group, one typically finds a smart guy who knows more than the rest and speaks bet...
Read more

Narendra Modi for PM? - No Thanks!

-
Some people think Narendra Modi should be India's PM. Here’s why I disagree. Whatever arguments, one may have in favour of him, we need to face it - certain truths about him can not be brushed under the carpet. Let us clearly understand that those who support Modi are in fact in favour of everything he stands for. 1) Modi belongs to the tribe that subscribes to the belief system that works with a vision, towards a "hindu rashtra". Where Muslims and Christians and whoever else need to understand and accept their proper place in the system. (for “good” reason of course based on a few actual and a few doctored historic facts) 2) He is capable of stooping to inhuman levels for this. And he is capable of not feeling any remorse for the tragedy. He claims it to be a "natural reaction". 3) Modi is capable of and does in fact see qualities that are worth admiring in Hitler. Gujrat will flourish even without Modi. The nation too, is and will continue to progress even wit...
Read more