How would Gandhiji react to the offensive video that mocks him?

As I sat surfing channels idly few days ago, I stopped at a visual I didn't want to believe. It was news of a man (of Indian origin) making a mockery of Mahatma Gandhi.

Yes the news stated that the video had created a national outrage and that the maker was asked to make a public apology. But it worried me nonetheless.

There are too many people in our country today who are ignorant (or have forgotten what they learnt in history lessons in school) about India's struggle for freedom. They don't know that this lanky, bald old man was named the "father of the nation”. Even if they did their limited minds don't feel curious as to why a weak-looking old man with scanty clothes would be given such a huge status. It worried me that such people may actually find this video extremely funny. They may watch it repeatedly and laugh repeatedly.

That aside, here's the lensewiping part: I exclaimed to my friends that I could shoot Gautham Prasad (the guy who made the film) dead! My friends were quick to point out that I was defying Gandhi ji by saying that.

It got me thinking. How would Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi have reacted had he seen this film? Some help from Mr. Rajkumar Hirani (the maker of ‘lagey raho munna bhai’) would be welcome here.

I think he'd have laughed and congratulated Gautam Prasad for his talent. He would however have expressed his concern about the talent being misused. He would have advised the lad to use his talents to earn the dignity he deserves rather than go down history for being foolish.

Who is Gautham Prasad? While the I&B minister is ready to take action against the news channels and youtube nobody seems to be catching the guy responsible for making the offensive film. Even the media has provided no further information on the boy other than the fact that he is an NRI comedian in the US and that his name is Gautham Prasad.

If these facts are right, then I’m guessing that Gautham is leading a real tough life in the US. Considering that he is a comedian who is struggling to be funny. So much so that he decided to upload a film of himself "being funny" on youtube. But again, he ended up goofing up miserably. I feel sorry for him. I don't mean to mock him. I am genuinely concerned for the chap. I think he should shift careers. Maybe he'll do better as a pizza delivery guy or a taxi driver.

It’s an art to use famous people to be genuinely funny. Take Jay Leno for example. He is sardonic but never offensive.

Well, I hope Gautham Prasad the very best in life. I hope he doesn't face too many hateful glares. I hope for him that someday he will be able to live up to his designation.

Comments

meraj said…
art under democracy, is always a tug between freedom of speech, aesthetic sensibilities and social sensitivity. in this case, freedom of speech won in a crude manner due to the waywardness of a kid.

and yes, Gandhi would have surely reacted in the manner explained by you.
Brown Weed said…
"I think he should shift careers. Maybe he'll do better as a pizza delivery guy or a taxi driver.."
this when you didn't mean to mock him!!

I believe public/viewer censorship is the only solution. In this case, it is good that our numerous news channels didn't sensationalize the issue (or maybe they didn't only per government direction).
Pooja Nair said…
That sure sounds like i was mocking him which is why i tried to clarify that i was not. :)

All i am saying is that there are always these options to be able to earn your daily bread.

So, why stoop to making an idiot of yourself to make a living?

Since he is clearly poor at being a comedian.

I am not upset at the media for having aired it. How else would we know of this issue?

Issue being the waywardness of some of today's yougsters.

But i'm happy that they did not sensationalize it. u r right that must be thanx to the I&B ministry.
Anonymous said…
I think it's so funny that you suggest the media didn't sensationalize this video. There are a gazillion video's on Youtube that would offend someone. The Indian media was looking for a story, chose to blow this up, and gave it more attention than Gautham would ever have anticipated. Who really expects their Youtube video to get more than a smattering of hits? He's a good guy whose sense of humor can embrace the absurd juxtaposition of an iconic hero and pole dancing. Notice that people in his audience are laughing, just as you might laugh if you saw a similar sketch featuring a different iconic figure. You don't have to find it funny, but if you can't happily ignore something this mild, then maybe you'd be happier in a country that doesn't respect the freedom of speech.
Juliet Jeske said…
I think his piece is more about being of Indian decent in the US. There are stereotypes of Indians and Ghandi is pretty much one of the few Indians Americans know. The media totally hyped this up, so many problems are ignored but a guy doing a dance is newsworthy?

I don't think Ghandi would be offended. I think he would be far more offended by Iraq or Darfur as should we all. And I really don't think this does much of anything to hurt Ghandi's reputation for freeing India through nonviolent resistence. He was a brilliant man, and I don't think this dampens his light.
Anonymous said…
Pooja, the difference between a truly free country like America and a country that claims to be free like India but isn't is that a comedian in America can get away with lampooning anybody, even the most saintly people in the world.

Clearly the fact that you could even mention shooting a comedian for expressing himself is a simple microcosm of the many problems that face India. In addition to rampant population growth (India is going to surpass China and population by the year 2020 if not before), an unfair and anachronistic caste system which keeps hundreds of millions of people down, and enormous inequities between the rich and the poor (for example, the rich guy who murdered a bartender and got away with it), now you have thousands of people calling for the execution of a comedian in America. That doesn't say much for India, doesn't it?
n00b said…
As far as I know, Mahatma Gandhi hated movies and similar mediums. He was even reluctant to visit Akshvani kendra. But knowing him from his literature I dont think he would have even bothered to express any comments on such foolish acts.

Even when he was alive he had tolerated such abuse. The Marxists and Islamic leaders had called him a clown etc. etc. The British themselves had made fun of him in public.

I think its time now that we as audience shout and tell media what exactly are we interested in. I see movie directors creating piece of disgusting footages and they call them movies. On top of that they present an argument that the youth likes such things.

So many attention seekers try to film something extraordinarily disgusting scenes in order to attain fame.
Read me at:
http://akshar.frihost.net/blog

If you find it worth add it to your blog roll.
Pooja Nair said…
I want to explain why this isn't so mild and how this isn't microcosm.

Iconic figures are more than just figures- they represent their ideals and thier message to the world.

Lampooning Gandhi means lampooning non-violence; it means lampooning peace; it means lampooning Hindu-Muslim unity.

These are underlying sentiments in India which Gautam unknowingly may have spurred. (i believe that it all eventually builds up which is why it worried me.)

I don't find lampooning someone funny. Not my kind of humour. Be it an icon or be it my neighbour! :)

Imitating someone or making a caricature of people on the other hand can be funny.

(This is my humble judgement of comedy. I am no authority on the subject)

Lastly FREEDOM always goes hand in hand with RESPONSIBILITY.

People across the world are focussing so much on their freedom, i wish they paid equal attention to the responsibilites that come with it.

I don't feel the media ignores all these other problems either. And I am a lot more concerned about all these real problems.

1000s calling America for Gautam's execution??? If true, that sure doesn't say much for India. It sure reflects on the microcosm of the Indian masses. (another thing thats concerns me)

I have nothing against Gautam. He could well be a nice guy but surely wayward. Thats ok. I just presented my opinion about it - i'm allowed to do that. :D
Anonymous said…
He sucks as a comedian. You anonymous dude... since you chose to be anonymous i am responding back the same way. You said that its such a mild comedy... Would you take it in the same light if Mr.JFK is mocked like this? Be sensitive to others emotions.

Popular posts from this blog

Narendra Modi - protector of Hindutva?

The joke in stereotypes

Narendra Modi for PM? - No Thanks!